Social Cause Website

Quinnipiac Title IX

Scope: Website (Academic Project)

Role: Lead UX/UI and Web Designer

THE PROBLEM

OVERVIEW


Sexual assault on college campuses remains an urgent and complex issue, often compounded by lack of accessible information, unclear reporting processes, and emotional barriers to seeking help. Quinnipiac University provides resources through its Title IX Office and Public Safety Dispatch, but these systems can feel fragmented or difficult to navigate.

This project involved designing a centralized, accessible website experience to inform, support, and guide students through understanding sexual misconduct policies, reporting options, and available resources. The platform was developed in collaboration with the university’s Title IX Office and Public Safety Dispatch to ensure accuracy, clarity, and sensitivity.

Objective

While resources existed, they were not presented in a way that prioritized user clarity, emotional safety, or ease of access. Students in high-stress situations require immediate, intuitive pathways to information and support.

Initial evaluation revealed
that users struggled with:

  • Unclear reporting pathways and terminology

  • Information overload without prioritization

  • Lack of emotional sensitivity in presentation

  • Difficulty locating urgent help resources quickly

  • Disconnected systems between Title IX and Public Safety

GOALS

  1. Create a centralized, easy-to-navigate resource hub

  2. Clarify reporting options and processes

  3. Prioritize accessibility and emotional sensitivity

  4. Support both immediate crisis needs and informational exploration

  5. Build trust through clear, supportive design language


DESIGN PROCESS

Empathize


Define



Ideate


Prototype

Prototype

UX/UI Analysis

The audit established a baseline understanding of how users interact with sensitive institutional information. A full content and interface audit identified recurring usability and emotional friction points:

  • Overwhelming blocks of text without hierarchy​

  • Unclear distinctions between reporting vs. informational content​

  • Hard-to-find emergency or immediate help actions​

  • Institutional tone lacking warmth or support​ Important actions buried within dense pages

Research & Interview Questions:

Conducting thorough research prior to designing the website allowed me to learn as much as possible about potential users and their needs. I tailored my questions to be as comprehensive as possible, putting an emphasis on how users feel.

  • 1. Can you tell me about your familiarity with campus safety resources?

    2.​ Have you ever needed to find sensitive or urgent information online?

    3.​ How comfortable are you navigating university websites?

  • 4.​ Have you ever visited a Title IX or campus safety page?

    5.​ What would motivate you to seek out this type of information?

    6.​ Walk me through how you would try to report an incident online.

  • 7.​ How easy or difficult is it to find important resources on university websites?

    8.​ Are there elements that make you hesitant to interact with certain
    pages?

    9.​ What would make reporting feel more accessible or clear?

  • 10.​ How should a website like this make you feel?

    11.​ What tone would make you feel supported and safe?

  • 12. ​What would discourage you from reporting or seeking help?

    13.​ Have you ever felt overwhelmed when searching for important information?

  • 14.​ If you could change one thing about campus resource websites, what would it be?

    15.​ What features would make this experience easier or more approachable?

    16.​ How likely are you to use a resource like this if it were improved?

User Interviews

Two college-aged participants were interviewed via virtual sessions to understand perceptions around safety, trust, and accessibility:

Participant 1

Aware but Hesitant User

Understood that resources existed but didn’t know where to find them ​Felt intimidated by formal or legal language ​Unsure of what happens after submitting a report ​Preferred anonymous or low-pressure options

Key Insight: Transparency and emotional reassurance are critical for engagement.

Unfamiliar User

Participant 2

Unaware of Title IX processes entirely ​Did not know reporting could be done online ​Felt overwhelmed by dense informational pages ​Needed clear guidance and step-by-step direction

Key Insight: Users need both education and clear action pathways.

Areas of Improvement

1.​ Lack of clarity in reporting vs. informational pathways

2.​ Overwhelming content presentation without hierarchy

3.​ Limited visibility of urgent help resources

Core Findings

→ Clarity over complexity: Users need direct, simplified pathways to action.

→ Emotional design matters: Tone and presentation impact willingness to engage.

→ Accessibility is critical: Information must be immediately visible and understandable.

Key Design Elements

LOCATION WITHIN THE APP

Home

Learn

Statistics

Support

Campus Safety
(Core Feature)

DESIGN CHOICES

  • Created branding element that emphasizes support, community, and the bobcat identity

  • Clearly define the initiative’s mission

  • Empathize with users who may have experienced sexual violence

  • Provided readily available resources

  • Illustrated significance and prevalence of the issue

  • Offered opportunity to learn on a deeper level

  • Provided five different pages/resources to help survivors understand more

    • Types of sexual violence, Understanding consent, Warning signs, Laws in Connecticut, Grooming warning signs

  • Each page contains accessible information, designed to empathize with users without alienating them

    • clearly established hierarchy helps to divide information and guide users

  • provided primary statistics for users

  • provided even more learning content about issue-specific statistics

    • party rape / fraternities; repeat offenders; the “red zone”; overall campus statistics 

  • pages have “report” feature embedded, highlighted yellow to make high priority within the page hierarchy

  • reiterated the support through the consistent bottom banner w/ hotline

  • utilized hug imagery to show comfort and support

  • utilized gentle language

  • interactive “FAQ-style” element so users can locate the content most important to them

  • different button color on the navigation to guide users there to make reports

  • clear visuals that show campus safety resources

  • provides information about the university’s Title IX office and the information for the head coordinator, as well as a link to the official page on the university’s website

  • also provided more details about the 988 lifeline and links to their official website

Prototyping

Methodology

Design high-fidelity wireframes from the beginning, focusing on layout clarity, accessibility, and emotional tone.

→ Goal of creating a calm, structured interface that prioritizes user needs in high-stress situations!


FINAL DESIGN

The redesigned experience includes pages that addressed the aforementioned pain points:

Homepage with immediate support access | Guided reporting flow | Resource directory | Educational content pages | Contact and support pages


This project highlighted the importance of designing for sensitive, high-stakes experiences where clarity, trust, and emotional awareness are essential.

What I Learned:

Designing for vulnerable users requires empathy-driven decision making

Clear structure and hierarchy reduce cognitive and emotional overload

Tone and language significantly impact user trust

Accessibility is not optional in critical information systems.

Future Opportunities

If continued, next steps would include:

Usability testing with a broader student audience

Collaboration with additional campus organizations

Integration with real-time support systems

Ongoing content updates and feedback loop

REFLECTION

Next
Next

2026 Quinnipiac Bateman Competition Report